|
|
Games Discuss anything relating to games |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
14-03-18, 08:07 AM | #9 | |
Community Founder
Top 5 Community Sponsor Join Date: Jan 2018
Last Online: Yesterday 09:19 AM
Total Donations: £299 (2/29)
Posts: 859
|
Quote:
The reason i prefer less lethal though comes back to just the game. I like to get 100 percent. Killing is penalised and rightly so to a degree. I also find when playing with a private group I take mp5 on armoured suspect missions. This is more realistic to swat teams. For example with a few suspects like Fairfax less lethal shotgun would be a real life choice as threat is minimal. Sadly though I play public most the time and taking less lethal teaches rambos tactics have to be used as you cannot rush and kill everything with less lethal setup. I agree about the comment saying tactics are only less lethal. That's crap. Depends on the player mentality with lethal. This is what gets confused. Both options used tactics, it's not about the kit but the use of it. Lastly I come back to why I choose less lethal personally.... Police don't like kills. Particularly in the UK. Many examples of when the British SAS have been called in to end sieges after police hand over control. When the military special forces get a green light, it is pretty much the end of the line for the suspects will be killed. Take the Iranian embassy siege. Police did not storm the building as their mentality is not like the military. They tried negotiations and failed. SAS mopped it up. Either way I play swat with a constant view suspects should face justice and be forced to comply. A death is a big thing for the police, but less lethal or lethal, the kill should be a last resort. That's more the discussion in my opinion. The tactics players take, which I see too many thinking it's counter strike. Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk
__________________
|SOG|Matt Group Founder |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|